- Bare Bones Software
- MacSpeech
- VMware
- Fetch Softworks
- CS Odessa
- Readers Like You!
- Mark/Space, Inc.
- Microsoft
- Circus Ponies
- Web Crossing

We're at Macworld Expo 2009 in San Francisco with the latest news about the show. Check back often this week for updates!
- Phil Schiller Delivers Lackluster Keynote
- iPhoto '09 Adds Faces and Places
- iMovie '09 Seems to Fix Everything from iMovie '08
- GarageBand '09 Adds Music Lessons
- iWork Turns '09
- Apple Moves to Unprotected Music, Tiered Prices
- Apple Pioneers New Battery Tech with 17-inch MacBook Pro
- Jobs Clears the Air on Health Issue
- Welcome to Macintosh Movie to Screen at Macworld Expo
- MacHEADS Movie to Premiere at Macworld Expo
- TidBITS Events at Macworld SF 2009
Syslogd Overwhelming Your Computer?
If your Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5) system is unexpectedly sluggish, logging might be the culprit. Run Activity Monitor (Applications/Utilities/ folder), and click the CPU column twice to get it to show most to least activity. If syslogd is at the top of the list, there's a fix. Syslogd tracks informational messages produced by software and writes them to the asl.db, a file in your Unix /var/log/ directory. It's a known problem that syslogd can run amok. There's a fix: deleting the asl.db file.
Launch Terminal (from the same Utilities folder), and enter these commands exactly as written, entering your administrative password when prompted:
sudo launchctl stop com.apple.syslogd
sudo rm /var/log/asl.db
sudo launchctl start com.apple.syslogd
Your system should settle down to normal. For more information, follow the link.
Visit Discussion of syslogd problem at Smarticus
Written by Glenn Fleishman
Recent TidBITS Talk Discussions
- iWork.com and MobileMe? (1 message)
- Safari Stalling on Opening PDF files (6 messages)
- A contrarian view of Macworld Expo's utility (3 messages)
- Secure Certificate Hack Doesn't Imperil Users (15 messages)
Published in NetBITS 9. Subscribe today to receive TidBITS in email every Monday.
- Hiatus for American Thanksgiving
- Pee En Gee - See Ya Real Soon!
- No Back Roads
- Question: How fast is a residential phone line?
- Question: How can I print or read a Web page offline?
56K Speed Jockeys Respond
Last week's article about 56K modems prompted a variety of responses. A few readers praised the performances of their 56 Kbps modems, while others weren't so lucky. For example, one person reported buying a K56Flex modem because his ISP had adopted that technology. "Wonder of wonders," he writes, "the highest speed attainable for me is 31.2 Kbps! What gives?"
In this case, the fault may lie with the phone company's wiring. To take advantage of 56K technology, you must have uninterrupted copper wire running from your house through the cross-connect point (your neighborhood wiring hub) to the central office (or CO). If the phone company runs short of copper from the cross-connect point to the CO, they may start using tricks like squeezing two lines onto one, which is fine for voice-quality transmissions, but noisy for high-speed modem communications. For more detailed information, see the FAQtoids later in this issue.
Other readers pointed out many modem manufacturers are hedging their bets with new 56K modems by making them upgradable to whichever 56K standard is adopted in the coming year. Global Village Communications seems to be offering the most flexibility to its customers by selling both a K56Flex modem and an X2 modem, both of which can be flash-upgraded to the new standard.
<http://www.globalvillage.com/macos8/MacOS8.html>
Jon Rust <jon@vcnet.com> wrote to clarify a bit about the FCC-imposed voltage cap on phone lines that limits X2 throughput to 53 Kbps instead of the full 56 Kbps:
K56Flex is not limited to 53 Kbps. X2 is limited, but the developers at Lucent and Rockwell did their homework. They do not break FCC regulations when they run at top speed. Of course, in the real world, you'd never see a 56 Kbps connection anyway. Phone lines just aren't that good yet. An additional point in favor of K56Flex is the lower latencies. As TidBITS pointed out recently, latency is what's killing modems. (See TidBITS-367.) With my K56Flex connection, I typically see ping times at around 90 ms. Compared to the 130 to 140 ms ping times from X2 (I've heard from several people, but never tried myself) and all 33.6 modems, this is quite an improvement. It's still short of ISDN though (about 25 ms). Quake is much more playable with 90 ms pings.
<http://db.tidbits.com/series/1014>
For more information on the K56Flex technology, see the Rockwell white paper below, which has moved to a different URL than the one reported last week.
<http://www.nb.rockwell.com/K56flex/whitepapers/ k56whitepaper.html>
WebCrossing Neighbors Creates Private Social NetworksCreate a complete social network with your company or group's
own look. Scalable, extensible and extremely customizable.
Take a guided tour today <http://www.webcrossing.com/tour>






