Most Popular Articles
- MobileMe Mail and Gmail Go Down Simultaneously (11 Aug 2008)
- Comparing Apple's MobileMe Contrition with Google and Netflix (19 Aug 2008)
- iPhone Apps That Go Beyond Entertainment (08 Aug 2008)
- Jobs Personally Acknowledges iPhone Bug and Upcoming Fix (19 Aug 2008)
Recent TidBITS Talk Discussions
- Archiving a Time Capsule (3 messages)
- Google Chrome (20 messages)
- How to Protect Yourself From The New Mac OS X Trojans (29 messages)
- Cox.net Will Not Send from iPhone (57 messages)
Other articles in the series Playing Monopoly!
- Microsoft Settles with AOL for $750 Million (02 Jun 03)
- Final Judgment in Microsoft Antitrust Case (04 Nov 02)
- Was Bill Gates Lying? (29 Apr 02)
- Into the Briar Patch: Microsoft's Self-Serving Settlement (03 Dec 01)
- Government Drops Microsoft Breakup Effort (10 Sep 01)
- Microsoft Appeals Monopoly Ruling to Supreme Court (13 Aug 01)
- Breaking Up Is Hard to Do (02 Jul 01)
- Judge Orders Microsoft Breakup; Company to Appeal (12 Jun 00)
- Microsoft Violated Anti-Trust Laws (03 Apr 00)
- Judge Finds Microsoft a Monopoly (08 Nov 99)
- Microsoft Treading Antitrust Waters? (25 Mar 91)
- Microsoft and Intuit Terminate Merger (22 May 95)
- Truth, Justice, and the American Way (01 May 95)
- Can't Buy Me Love - Microsoft Antitrust Ruling (20 Feb 95)
- Antitrust Lawsuits Filed Against Microsoft (18 May 98)
- Who Do You Antitrust? Part 2 (23 Nov 98)
- Who Do You Antitrust? Part 1 (16 Nov 98)
- Microsoft Antitrust Case to Supreme Court (26 Jun 00)
Published in TidBITS 612. Subscribe today to receive TidBITS in email every Monday.
- iMac, iPhoto Corrections
- Macworld Expo SF 2002 Overview
- Macworld Expo San Francisco 2002 Superlatives
- Peering Into 2002's Tea Leaves
Proposed Microsoft Settlement Rejected
Proposed Microsoft Settlement Rejected -- U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz agreed with critics that the proposed $1 billion settlement of the combined private class-action suits against Microsoft appeared to "provide a means for flooding a part of the kindergarten through high school market, in which Microsoft has not traditionally been the strongest player (particularly in relation to Apple), with Microsoft software and refurbished hardware." (See "Into the Briar Patch: Microsoft's Self-Serving Settlement" in TidBITS-607.) In rejecting the settlement, Judge Motz also commented that the proposal for Microsoft to give away software "could be viewed as constituting 'court approved predatory pricing.'" Despite these harsh words, Judge Motz was not unsympathetic the basic idea behind the settlement, but he suggested that Microsoft should pay the settlement amount in cash into a special fund, from which schools could purchase whatever hardware and software they chose. Lawyers for both sides said they would continue to work on a revised settlement, and failing that, go to trial. [ACE]
<http://db.tidbits.com/article/06645>
<http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/Press/2002/ Jan02/01-11ClassActionDecisionPR.asp>
WebCrossing Neighbors Creates Private Social NetworksCreate a complete social network with your company or group's
own look. Scalable, extensible and extremely customizable.
Take a guided tour today <http://www.webcrossing.com/tour>






