Most Popular Articles
- Prune Your Time Machine Backups Selectively (01 May 2008)
- Back to My Mac Leads to Recovery of Stolen Mac (10 May 2008)
- Time Machine Exposed! (08 May 2008)
- Hand Coding HTML Is Still in Vogue (25 Apr 2008)
Recent TidBITS Talk Discussions
- Cable TV to Mac (1 message)
- Good time or dumb time to buy an iPod Touch (5 messages)
- color profiles and browsers (2 messages)
- Digital Rights Misery: When Technology Is Designed to Fail (3 messages)
In Take Control of Apple Mail in Leopard, by Joe Kissell, you'll learn how to make your email come and go as it should and easily find the email that you want to read. You'll also get help with Time Machine backups of email and much more. $10.
Published in TidBITS 913. Subscribe today to receive TidBITS in email every Monday.
- Microsoft Bids $44.6 Billion for Yahoo
- CS Odessa Sponsoring TidBITS
- DealBITS Drawing: Win a Copy of Sound Studio 3
- Crazy Apple Rumors Site Kills Self, Collapses Mineshaft
- Fix for Mysterious Word 2008 Crash
- For Want of a File, an Operating System Was Lost
- Quick Fix for a Mac Typing in the Wrong Language
- Catalog Choice Slammed by Direct Marketing Association
- New Leopard Ebooks Help with Backups, Maintenance, and More
- Looking Video Chat Problems in the Eye
- When Is a Warranty Not a Warranty?
- Hot Topics in TidBITS Talk/04-Feb-08
iWork and iWeb Updated, Apple Restricts Release Notes
Apple has released updates to the components of the iWork suite via Software Update and as standalone downloads, bumping Keynote to version 4.0.2 (32 MB download), Pages to 3.0.2 (27.8 MB download), and Numbers to 1.0.2 (26.2 MB download). Separately, iWeb was revved to 2.0.3 (17.2 MB download). The release notes for these updates set a new low even for Apple, noting for Pages, Numbers, and iWeb that "This update addresses compatibility with Mac OS X" and expounding only more slightly for Keynote that "This update primarily addresses performance issues while playing or exporting presentations."
I'm becoming increasingly fed up with Apple's reluctance to admit that they might have fixed a bug when releasing an update to one of their programs. I can see an argument that average users may not care what specifically changed, but release notes that say merely "This update addresses compatibility with Mac OS X" are just patronizing. Some people actually use these programs for real work and care deeply about changes. Describing what's new in a program gives the interested user the necessary information to determine if an update is likely to solve a particular problem. And since some updates actually cause new problems to crop up, release notes that could be summarized with a grunt and "Update good" verge on the negligent.
Come on, Apple, acknowledge that you have professional users whose livelihoods depend on your programs and the information you publish about them. I'm not saying you have to overwhelm Software Update users with detail that most people couldn't possibly understand, but somewhere on your Web site, how about providing real release notes that actually document what has changed? It's all about trust - you want us to trust your updates without question, but if you can't trust us to make our own informed decisions, why should we trust your software to work in mission-critical situations? If you need a role model, check out the release notes from Bare Bones Software, which lay out clearly exactly what has been added, changed, and fixed.
READERS LIKE YOU! Support TidBITS with a contribution today!<http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>
Special thanks this week to MWP Books, Alan B. Combs,
Tom Fortmann, and Neil Faiman for their generous support!
Bookmark at: del.icio.us | digg | reddit | Slashdot